Dev Narsinghani

India Label Index 2026 / Grain-word packs and FSSAI warnings

21 of 27 grain-word packs would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label

All numbers come from Open Food Facts, a food database filled in by volunteers. They show the packs people have added, not a random sample of the shops in any country.

A fair comparison shows that 18 of 23 grain-word packs with a food category would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label, about as often as the plain packs in their own category. At the warning rate of the plain packs in their own category, 19.1 of the 23 would be expected to carry it, and 18 do.

Published

549Indian packaged foods were checked for grain words and FSSAI's proposed warning label
27 of 549Have a grain word in the product name
78%Of those 27, 21 would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label
84%Of 482 packs with no healthy-sounding word, 403 would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label

How to check a pack yourself

  1. Read the back. Turn the pack over and skip the front name. Look at the nutrition table per 100 g.
  2. Check salt first. Multiply sodium by 2.5 to find salt. If it is high, the pack would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label.
  3. Look at fat and sugar. Check if added fat or added sugar is high. If yes, the pack would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label.

Quick answers

Does a grain word mean healthier

No. 21 of 27 grain-word packs would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label. A fair comparison shows that 18 of 23 grain-word packs with a food category would carry it, about as often as the plain packs in their own category. At the warning rate of the plain packs in their own category, 19.1 of the 23 would be expected to carry it, and 18 do.

Why grain-word packs still get the warning

Of the 21 grain-word packs that would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label, 15 are high in added fat, 13 are high in salt, and 8 are high in added sugar. A pack can be high in more than one.

Bread and cereals with grain words

All 7 bread and bakery packs with grain words (like breads, kulcha, and chapati) would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label. All 7 are warned for salt. Seven of 12 breakfast cereals and muesli with grain words would also carry the warning.

How a name was counted

The product name is read after removing the brand's own words. So, a brand with a health word in its name is never counted. Grain words like whole wheat, oats, and ragi are counted. Other healthy-sounding words like healthy or natural are also counted, and their results are in the data file.

Is the warning in force

No. FSSAI's proposed warning label is not in force. It is a proposal from FSSAI as of 23 September 2026. The Supreme Court has not ruled on it yet.

Grain-word packs and FSSAI warnings
Packs with a grain word in the name: 78% (from 27 products)Packs with a grain word in the name78% (27) Packs with no healthy-sounding word: 84% (from 482 products)Packs with no healthy-sounding word84% (482) Bread and bakery packs with a grain word: 100% (from 7 products)Bread and bakery packs with a grain word100% (7)

Most grain-word packs would still carry FSSAI's proposed warning label.

Every measure

MeasureFSSAI's proposed warning
Packs with a grain word in the name78% (21 of 27)
Packs with no healthy-sounding word84% (403 of 482)
Grain-word packs with a category, warned against expected at the plain rate18 against 19.1 (of 23)
Bread and bakery packs with a grain word100% (7 of 7)
Breakfast cereals and muesli with a grain word58% (7 of 12)

Shares in brackets are k of n.

How I did it

I checked 549 Indian packaged foods from Open Food Facts. These are non-staple foods with full nutrition tables and ingredient lists. I left out supplements, staples, and 106 single-ingredient foods like plain rolled oats. A pack would carry FSSAI's proposed warning label if any one of added sugar, added fat, or salt is high, based on the ICMR-NIN limits. The fat count is an upper estimate because labels give total fat, not added fat. When an oil or fat is listed, all the fat counts as added. The lists come from Open Food Facts, entered by volunteers, so they are not a random sample. The numbers are small, so read the shares as rough. FSSAI's proposed warning label is not in force. The Supreme Court has not ruled. No brands are named.

What this can't tell you

  • The lists come from Open Food Facts, entered by volunteers, so they are not a random sample.
  • The numbers are small (27 grain-word packs), so read the shares as rough.
  • Labels give total fat, not added fat, so when an oil or fat is listed all the fat counts as added: an upper estimate.
  • FSSAI's warning is a proposal. The Supreme Court has not ruled.
  • No brands are named.

Data and code

See also If FSSAI's warning labels started today. Part of the India Label Index 2026.

Narsinghani, D. (2026). Grain-word packs and FSSAI warnings. India Label Index 2026. https://devnarsinghani22.github.io/india-label-index/healthy-names/. Data from Open Food Facts (ODbL). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23245061.